Skip to main content

Let's keep it personal..IBM Connect and the soul of Lotus

Today I start a new challenge,  working for an IBM Premier Business Partner called Portal in Bracknell, Berkshire.  I'll be helping their customers make, and get value from, their investments in IBM Collaboration software of all types : from transactional portal application dressed with user managed web content, through Social Software for organisations on the road to becoming a social business, and not forgetting along the way our Notes/Domino customers who've been getting value from Notes, Sametime and other Lotus products for over 20 years.  Today's the day to meet the Portal people and get connected - many of these people I have known from project work over the years and it's a great pleasure to be linking up with and working with them again.

The main thing on my mind today : the decision to embed Lotusphere 2013 inside the IBM Connect event. I have two contradictory thoughts on this :
  1. "It's not a moment too soon" : customers are confused about the term "Lotus" which has been carved out of all except the traditional Notes/Domino product nomenclature such as Lotus (now IBM) Connections.   It's not about a brand name or label, but about customer value and customers' objectives to facilitate improved productivity through better connected-ness.  We should clear away legacy brand-based approaches to realise this bigger vision.
  2. "Lotus is the philosophical heart of collaboration software" : emotionally speaking, "Lotus" represents, overwhelmingly to existing customers, the people-entry point to the enterprise at its most focused.   Lotus has never been as much a technology stack as a symbol of an approach or paradigm which is at its heart more about people than places or things.   Losing the term means more than just relabelling : it's indicative of a less "human" guiding spirit behind software and its application.
To be honest, when I examine it, I find the latter sentiment to be, er, sentimental, and over-subjective.  We all perceive the value of a "brand" but we should be realistic about its longevity, and the potential for time to dilute its meaning.  But I can fully understand how, given the history of Lotus and its fantastic customers, how that loyalty comes about and persists, especially at a time of great change and challenge.  And I also recognise that maintaining customer loyalty requires a recognition of the emotional content of that loyalty, gained along a mutual journey.  If we recognise this, and factor this into our conversations with customers, we will do fine.  If we forget it, and treat social business as an IT challenge to be solved "just" with middleware and databases, we'll fail.  How will IBM Connect announce IBM's intentions, I wonder?   I think it promises to be a great event, where IBM's technology and social business thought leadership come together, and I hope it brings to the stage both the head and the heart of collaboration.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Keep people on the wagon to make social software stick

Aside from the buzz and enthusiasm of social software deployments, there's sometimes a back-story.  I've been wondering about how well organsations deploying social software plan catch to on-boarded users before they fall back to old habits. Here's the scenario that I am thinking of. When we deploy business change technologies, we tend to measure on-boarding as a one-off activity (we measure stuff like that partly because it's easy to measure, which is a bit of an anti-pattern in itself).  So, once a user has been trained, posted, edited a profile, added people to a network, we cross them off a list.  However, this fails to recognise what, from my experience, is the strong influence of learned-behaviour of the non-social user, and how these users' inertia can reset interactions to levels of lower social value. The reasons we fall back to old ways and habits are many: The derived social value of an interaction obeys the "Convoy" principle The answer

Ironman UK 2012 - Friday evening and Saturday

During Friday afternoon I laid out all my kit in the hotel room, and bagged. Sad to say I even rehearsed the changes, just to make sure I had the right stuff in the right bags. Then I bagged up Red and Blue bags and put them to one site. Friday night was pretty grim – a tip to others : if you are planning to stay in the Holiday Inn, book very early and demand a room on the third / fourth floor or higher, because otherwise you'll lose even more sleep from the wedding parties (they can run two at a time) which occur, noisily, on the ground floor till 1 am. I managed a few dozes till the partying stopped around 1 am and then Saturday was set-up day : a first look at the lake, and T1 and T2. But first I went down to check out the Ironkids event in the town centre  This was basically a run event for 6 yro and up kids who had a blast running around the last km of the run route and under the Ironman Finish banner. Fun to see them and hear the parents and friends cheer

Brighton Marathon 2013...a blast

I was lucky enough to be able to run the Brighton Marathon today : I did this in memory of my father-in-law (full story here ).   I;ve not run a marathon since London in (I think) 1992 : the ADT era, when the finish was on Lambeth Bridge, not the Mall, and we all ran in plus-fours.  Joking about the last bit.  I ran about 3:30 on that day in 1992, at the age of 29, and with a lot more single-sport dedication to running.  Now I am 50, I was thinking it would be interesting to see how I could run a single event marathon. Brighton is a young (4 runnings) but big race : 9000 competitors.  The route starts from Preston Park, does a shimmy or two around the town centre, then sends you first east, then west along the sea front. Finish is just past the pier. Conditions were good : the overnight rain cleared up, there as  a bit of light white cloud to keep the sun away, and some breeze but not a wind.   I had a few 20 mile/3 hour runs in my recent training past, but two weeks ago picked up